Prepared for the Auditor General for Scotland and the Accounts Commission Audit Scotland, December 2012
The Scottish Government should:
The Scottish Government and NHS boards should:
The Scottish Government and CPPs should:
NHS boards should:
NHS boards and councils should:
Accounting for Scotland’s Excess Mortality:
Towards a Synthesis
Glasgow Centre for Population Health April 2011
The reasons for the high Scottish mortality between 1950 and 1980 are unclear, but poverty and deprivation linked to particular industrial employment patterns, poor housing and unhealthy cultural and behavioural patterns seem the more likely explanations. From 1980 onwards the mortality pattern changed and this seems most likely to be attributable to the changed political context, produced by neoliberal political attack, and the consequent hopelessness and community disruption experienced in Scotland and Glasgow. This perspective may have relevance to faltering health improvement in other countries, such as the USA. Further research, linked to integration and synthesis of the most likely causal explanations, is merited, as is further work to design policies and interventions to create a healthier future for Scottish communities.
Scotland; Glasgow; mortality; Scottish Effect; Glasgow Effect.
What kinds of policies to reduce health inequalities do researchers support?
Authors: Smith, K.E. , Kandlik Eltanani, M. , Hill, S.E.
Global Public Health Unit, School of Social & Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
School of Social & Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Background: A wealth of research on health inequalities has been produced over the
past 40 years, much of it within the UK, and there have been multiple initiatives
aiming to reduce health inequalities in policy and practice. Despite all this, it
has been widely reported that these efforts have been unsuccessful and that the UK’s
health inequalities have continued to widen. In this context, there have been suggestions
that more ‘public health advocacy’ is required, yet there appears to be a lack of
consensus as to exactly what those committed to reducing health inequalities ought
to be advocating. This report is based on a two-
The Role and Impact of Social Capital on the Health and Wellbeing of Children & Adolescents: A systematic review
Dr Kerri McPherson, Dr Susan Kerr, Dr Elizabeth McGee,
Professor Francine Cheater, Professor Antony Morgan
Glasgow Caledonian University and the Glasgow Centre for Population Health: January 2013
To the best of our knowledge, this review is the first to systematically collate, analyse and synthesise the international, empirical, peer reviewed evidence on the role and impact of social capital on the health and wellbeing of children and adolescents. While others have made inroads in this field (e.g. Ferguson), the number of studies included in previous reviews has been much smaller and, thus, less comprehensive in comparison. In conducting such a large scale review, we are able to provide solid evidence to demonstrate that family and community social capital are associated with differences in children’s and adolescents’ experiences of health and wellbeing. Families that are nurturing and cohesive provide an environment in which children and adolescents are able to thrive. Moreover, children and adolescents who are able to acquire social capital in and through their local communities have the potential for much better health and wellbeing. This evidence has significant and wide reaching implications for policy makers, practitioners, researchers and educators alike.
While it is clear that family and community social capital are associated with positive
outcomes for pre-
SCHW Recommended Reading
“Understanding a Community-
Jane Dailly and Alan Barr, Pub: (SCDC), Scottish Community Development Centre, 2008
“Asset Based Approaches for Health Improvement: Redressing the Balance
Jennifer MacLean, Pub: Glasgow Centre for Population Health, 2010
“Evaluation of the Healthy Lining Centre Programme in Scotland”
Stephen Platt et al, Pub: Research Unit Health Behaviour
Report of the Ministerial Task Force on Health Inequalities (2013)
Thursday, March 13, 2014
This is the second review by the Ministerial Task Force on Health Inequalities following publication of Equally Well in 2008. The first review was undertaken in 2010 and focused on progress and how well agencies were responding to the principles set out in Equally Well. This review looked at how communities are being engaged in the decisions that affect them and also the importance that "place" has on health inequalities.
The Task Force identified the following areas as priorities:
Development of Social Capital
Support for CPPs and the community planning process
Examine and potentially enhance what we do that impacts on the 15-
Support the implementation of a Place Standard
Finally, the Task Force also considered its own input into the work to tackle health
inequalities and agreed that alternative arrangements for coordination of work to tackle health inequalities should be considered.
Capitalism isn’t working:
by Will Hutton. The Guardian 23/4/14
" Interesting article from the Guardian on the causes of growing and dangerous wealth
inequalities in Britain and other western countries. It provides good evidence based
arguments for the critical role of community-
Scottish Communities for Health and Wellbeing (SCHW) & Healthy n Happy Community Development Trust
Phone number: 0141 646 0123
The Labour Group of the Scottish Parliament is carrying out an enquiry/consultation into strategies to tackle health inequalities. SCHW with a case study from Healthy n Happy community development Trust has provided a submission which is available.
Copyright © 2014 www.schw.co.uk All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions
16 Farmeloan Road
Registered Scottish Charity:
Information about the roles of SCDC, CHEX and SCHW: 2014
Who they are, What they are, Funding, Their Vision, What they do.